![]() One solution I can think of is to disable the option mapping for tab specifically: Then I could hit command-tab, which iTerm2 would interpret as option-tab, but not send along as ESC-tab, and instead ignore so that HyperSwitch could pick it up. I'm guessing that the Mac OS switcher is able to intercept the command-tab sequence before iTerm2 sees it and does the command / option swap, even when Secure Keyboard Entry is on but that HyperSwitch can't do that, because the Mac OS switcher is more special? Dunno. But it doesn't seem to let HyperSwitch capture it and turning Secure Keyboard Entry off doesn't work for my case because of the command / option swap. letting the Mac OS switcher capture the command-tab. This seems very similar to #7814 (closed), except that Secure Keyboard Entry seems to me like it's closer to doing the right thing, i.e. So it looks like the command / option swap is taking precedence over Mac OS picking off the command-tab combination, which is presumably as expected.Ĭommand-tab should activate HyperSwitch, even when command and option are swapped. If I quit from HyperSwitch, and turn off Secure Keyboard Entry, I get the same effect: command-tab sends ESC TAB, option-tab activates the regular Mac Switcher. command-tab sends an ESC TAB sequence to the terminal window.If I turn off Secure Keyboard Entry in iTerm2, I get this behavior instead: Except by hitting ESC and then TAB of course. (And option-tab continues to do "Profile CPU Usage" I don't have a way to send an ESC TAB sequence to the terminal window, as expected. If I quit from HyperSwitch, command-tab activates the regular Mac OS switcher, as expected. When any other app is active, command-tab activates the HyperSwitch switcher, as expected. (Also, if I hit option-tab, it does "Profile CPU Usage", as you'd expect, since option is mapped to command.) The regular Mac switcher activates, rather than the HyperSwitch switcher. ![]() While iTerm2 is the active window, hit command-tab.Run HyperSwitch, configured to activate the switcher for all windows with command-tab.map left-option and right-option to Esc .Create virtual network and leave that virtual network dedicated to that VM alone.Thanks for filing an issue! Please answer the questions below so I can help you. Untangle is another product that can facilitate this. One connected to the virtual network (internal), and one connected to the Internet (external). If your VMs need interaction with the Internet, you will need an intermediary such as an ISA box with 2 NICs. Two: VM is connected to a virtual network you created (internal only). General Shortcuts Cmd , (comma) to access preferences for the current app Cmd F2 focuses the top menu bar (you can turn off the machine from here) Cmd F3 focuses the dock related: you probably want to turn off Ctrl F1 which enables and disables the above Look in the keyboard settings. Then Virtual NIC is physically plugged into your network. One: VM is connected to your internal network. Tighter security is possible using AzMan. Note, add your domain user name to the local admin group on the Hyper-V box to enable you to manage. You can then use Hyper-V Manager on any Vista SP1 box to manage your Hyper-V. The other NIC will be physically connected to your network and either have a static IP assigned or receive an IP via DHCP Reservation. ![]() The Hyper-V OS will not need any contact with whatever is plugged into that NIC. Once you have your virtual switch on the NIC you are using with your VMs, you can safely disable that NIC as the virtual switch runs at the hardware level anyway. They will not function properly when the gateways are on two separate, disjoint networks (such as one on your intranet and one on the Internet). "Warning - Multiple default gateways are intended to provide redundancy to a singe network (such as an intranet or the Internet). I also tried to give the virtual NIC attached to the physical NIC static IP address information but got the following warning below. I have noticed that the virtual switch tries to register in DNS but an error is generated that says the 169.x.x.x (APIPA) address could not be registered because it contains 0.0.0.0 (exact text not quoted) So to remedy this I unchecked the Register in DNS check box. QUESTION 2: Can I assign a static IP on the VM's NIC? Also the NIC for the VM has been assigned to use the External NIC (Virtual Switch). I have installed the Hyper-v Integration Services on the VM. QUESTION 1: Should this virtual NIC pull a DHCP, APIPA, or be assigned a static IP address? The Virtual NIC has everything else but the "Microsoft virtual network switch protocol" checked. The physical (Intel) NIC has only the "Microsoft virtual network switch protocol" checked. A virtual switch was created as an External virtual network. I installed hyper-v Role bound Intel card to hyper-v. Hardware = Dell T105 Server with broadcom onboard GB NIC and Intel 1000MT GB (single port PCI) NIC. I'm trying to get hyper-v to work correctly.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |